Published by Dr Sayori Ghoshal:

Science of Difference: Producing Racial and Religious Identities Through Nationalist Science, India 1920-2020

Summary: My project ‘Science of Difference: Producing Racial and Religious Identities Through Nationalist Science, India 1920-2020’ interrogates the role of physical anthropology, serology, genetic anthropology and statistics, in naturalizing religious and caste hierarchies. Under colonial rule, Indian scientists rejected the claim that Europeans were racially superior to Indians. However, they did not dismiss race as a scientific object. Instead, from the 1920s, Indian scientists sought to measure the extent of racial mixing between castes and religious groups. Asking where Indian Muslims had come from and whether Christians were indigenous, they calculated physical features, blood-group distribution, and genetic variations to produce a map of the nation’s racial and religious past. My project contributes to the aim of the grant scheme by analyzing how science and religion were co-constituted. That is, how scientific objectivity was built through measuring religious differences, while religious hierarchy came to be constituted as natural through its uncritical

Read More

Translating Data, Visualizing the Nation: How Quantitative Data Helped Envision Modern India 

By Sayori Ghoshal In 2022, I began working on an INSBS-funded grant project on the impact of race science and statistics on religious and caste identities in colonial India. Under colonial rule, Indian scientists had rejected the claim that Europeans were racially superior to Indians. However, they had not dismissed race as a scientific object. Instead, from the 1920s, Indian scientists had sought to measure the extent of racial mixing between castes and religious groups. Asking where Indian Muslims had come from and whether Christians were indigenous to the subcontinent, they calculated physical features, blood-group distribution, and genetic variations to produce maps of the nation’s racial and religious past. In the project, I analyzed how science and religion thus came to be co-constituted. That is, how scientific objectivity was built through measuring religious differences, while religious hierarchy came to be constituted as natural through its uncritical conversion to scientific data.  

Read More